Objection pursuant to Rule 114(3): Simplification of the content and presentation of information to be disclosed concerning environmentally sustainable activities and simplification of certain technical screening criteria for determining whether economic activities cause no significant harm to environmental objectives
Status: Parliament has rejected this proposal.
In plain language
The plain-language summary is coming soon. In the meantime, read the official text.
How parliament voted
Rejected on 17 December 2025230 for · 402 against · 28 abstention(s)
In the European Parliament, a parliamentary group is a group of MEPs from like-minded parties in different countries. For each group, you can see how many members voted for or against, or abstained.
- For
- Against
- Abstain
- Dot: colour of the group
-
EPP (Christian Democrats) Divided
2 for · 166 against · 5 abstentions
-
S&D (Social Democrats) Voted for
126 for · 0 against · 0 abstentions
-
Patriots for Europe Divided
5 for · 73 against · 0 abstentions
-
ECR (Conservatives) Voted against
0 for · 75 against · 0 abstentions
-
Renew (Liberals) Divided
0 for · 53 against · 15 abstentions
-
Greens/EFA Voted for
48 for · 0 against · 0 abstentions
-
The Left Voted for
42 for · 0 against · 0 abstentions
-
Non-attached Divided
7 for · 11 against · 8 abstentions
-
Europe of Sovereign Nations Voted against
0 for · 24 against · 0 abstentions
How MEPs voted, by country
Each country elects its own MEPs. Here you can see how the members from each country voted, regardless of their group.
🇲🇹 MEPs from Malta
Majority in favour3 for · 2 against · 0 abstentions
See all countries
-
🇦🇹 Austria
-
🇧🇪 Belgium
-
🇧🇬 Bulgaria
-
🇭🇷 Croatia
-
🇨🇾 Cyprus
-
🇨🇿 Czechia
-
🇩🇰 Denmark
-
🇪🇪 Estonia
-
🇫🇮 Finland
-
🇫🇷 France
-
🇩🇪 Germany
-
🇬🇷 Greece
-
🇭🇺 Hungary
-
🇮🇪 Ireland
-
🇮🇹 Italy
-
🇱🇻 Latvia
-
🇱🇹 Lithuania
-
🇱🇺 Luxembourg
-
🇲🇹 Malta
-
🇳🇱 Netherlands
-
🇵🇱 Poland
-
🇵🇹 Portugal
-
🇷🇴 Romania
-
🇸🇰 Slovakia
-
🇸🇮 Slovenia
-
🇪🇸 Spain
-
🇸🇪 Sweden
Figures: for / against / abstention.